I was burnt out.
I also starting blogging and reading blogs a lot more in this time so my reading materials mostly consisted of other blogs and my books got sorely neglected. So five years later I'm getting back into reading some of those more 'meaty' books I picked up in school.
The book comes from a very pro-Socialism standpoint. His thesis seems to be that unless a lot of people embrace socialism very soon, the only alternative will be Fascism which, to paraphrase, is basically Socialism without any of the good stuff. He points out a few reasons that people at the time were hesitant to consider it, despite agreeing with many of the ideals. One argument, that could easily applied to today and the tendency of lower-middle class to accept the fallacy of trickle-down economics, is that the class-conciousness of the time meant that people who, by upbringing, considered themselves 'middle-class' (described by Orwell as 'those who pronouce their aitches') were being pushed into the working class by way of economics. One who was raised to think of themselves as a higher class than the working class may, out of fear of 'losing their place', be apt to align themselves with systems that benefit the rich, than systems that are actually more likely to be in their own best interests.
The other issue Orwell brings up is the tendency to avoid Socialism out of a desire not to align oneself with the prevailing ideal of what it means to be a "Socialist". The caricature of the pistachio-shirted, sandalled, stuffy, boring, intellectual type is similar to the image of the man-hating, hairy-legged butch lesbian who will scream at someone who holds doors that causes many people to say "Yeah, I believe men and women should have the same rights, but I'm not a feminist..."
(For the record, I fully identify as a feminist, but I am still grateful when someone holds a door for me.. why? BECAUSE IT'S A NICE THING TO DO, NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE.)
Long story short, I found this book a hell of a lot more interesting than I had originally thought I would. The descriptions of the daily lives of the British coal miners and the living conditions of the unemployed of the working poor at the time made me look around at all I have and thank Gord for what I have. The later parts of the book where he describes the machine age and its effects on the human population had me nodding in agreement, as many of the passages could easily have been written today.
Have not read that particular Orwell, though I've read a lot of his other stuff. The short, "To Shoot an Elephant," was an eye opener. Anyhow, I'm adding that to my reading list, though grad school puts me in pretty much the same straits as you once were in.ReplyDelete
Thoughtful post. Thank you.
It is strange how readily people will vote against their own interests.
I've only ever read 1984 which I have to say is one of my favourite books.ReplyDelete
Er, sorry. Typical me, I misremembered the title of the Orwell piece I referenced. It's called "Shooting an Elephant." Here's a link: http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/887/ReplyDelete
I'll have to check that out.ReplyDelete
Tony, I enjoyed that one as well. There's another the boyfriend recommended about the Spanish Civil War but the title escapes me.
Good for you! I didn't read for fun in uni either, and then started picked up the old classics. Then i got hooked. I mostly read novels, but I sometimes like a socialism article too. :) (Re-read a uni book recently, called "Life: The Movie" and loved it.)ReplyDelete