Today Parliament, in spite of Steve-O's empty promises not to reopen the abortion debate, is debating whether to have a big old special committee to discuss the whole “Does life begin at conception” thing. I caught a snippet on the news this morning regarding the debate, and later came across the story through Twitter (via @creativetweets).
Abortion rights debate spurred by MP's motion
Abortion rights debate spurred by MP's motion
Granted, the definition of the current law, which basically states that life begins when you fall out of your mom's vagina, is rather outdated seeing as it's based on a British definition that goes back about 400 years. Any woman who has had her ribs bruised to shit by a fetus that seems to fancy itself the next Bruce Lee will tell you that this definition doesn't quite ring true.
But I am not, for one second, buying that this debate is being held in the name of clearing up an old definition in the name of being more scientifically accurate and “in line with 21st century medicine”. Especially when you consider that Stephen Woodworth, the Conservative MP who brought it to the table, all but admitted that the motion is linked to abortion.
Woodworth wants to have an honest discussion but I think it's a discussion that should be kind of moot. Regardless of when government rules ‘life’ begins, does one ‘person’ (or fetus') right to life cancel out another person's right to NOT have another person take residence in their body for up to nine months, possibly to the detriment of her own health?
I'd say no, regardless of how this fetus or person got there (ie, the ‘good' abortion vs the ‘bad' abortion) and no regardless of whether the reasons for abortion are considered selfish or noble/tragic. Pro-choice means choice for all, even if we don't like or agree with those choices. Anything less and we run the risk of allowing our rights over our bodies to be eroded.
I'm glad to hear that at least the NDP is planning to vote along party lines with the idea that the right to choose is NOT up for debate. Conservatives, we don't know for sure, but it doesn't look good. Rae has said that the Liberals will likely be allowed to 'vote their conscience'..
My friend @corecorina posted a link on twitter to a petition put forth by Liberal party member Lucie Pepin. I will be signing and I encourage those who are eligible to sign as well. We've already seen from the way things have been going to hell in a handbasket in the U.S. that allowing this debate to open again can quickly dissolve into a slippery slope to the point where even a miscarriage could potentially be grounds for criminal charges.
But I am not, for one second, buying that this debate is being held in the name of clearing up an old definition in the name of being more scientifically accurate and “in line with 21st century medicine”. Especially when you consider that Stephen Woodworth, the Conservative MP who brought it to the table, all but admitted that the motion is linked to abortion.
Woodworth wants to have an honest discussion but I think it's a discussion that should be kind of moot. Regardless of when government rules ‘life’ begins, does one ‘person’ (or fetus') right to life cancel out another person's right to NOT have another person take residence in their body for up to nine months, possibly to the detriment of her own health?
I'd say no, regardless of how this fetus or person got there (ie, the ‘good' abortion vs the ‘bad' abortion) and no regardless of whether the reasons for abortion are considered selfish or noble/tragic. Pro-choice means choice for all, even if we don't like or agree with those choices. Anything less and we run the risk of allowing our rights over our bodies to be eroded.
I'm glad to hear that at least the NDP is planning to vote along party lines with the idea that the right to choose is NOT up for debate. Conservatives, we don't know for sure, but it doesn't look good. Rae has said that the Liberals will likely be allowed to 'vote their conscience'..
My friend @corecorina posted a link on twitter to a petition put forth by Liberal party member Lucie Pepin. I will be signing and I encourage those who are eligible to sign as well. We've already seen from the way things have been going to hell in a handbasket in the U.S. that allowing this debate to open again can quickly dissolve into a slippery slope to the point where even a miscarriage could potentially be grounds for criminal charges.





